4,833
edits
Changes
From TheBookbag
Jump to navigationJump to searchThe Fourth of July: And the Founding of America by Peter De Bolla (view source)
Revision as of 19:43, 5 September 2008
, 19:43, 5 September 2008no edit summary
{{infoboxsort
|title=The Fourth of July: And the Founding of America
|sort=Fourth of July: And the Founding of America
|author=Peter De Bolla
|reviewer=Paul Harrop
|genre=History
|summary=A scholarly and occasionally enlightening investigation of the truths and half-truths surrounding the birth of the American nation.
Could be heavy going for those not totally fascinated by the subject.
|rating=3
|buy=No
|borrow=Yes
|format=Hardback
|pages=224
|publisher=Profile Books Ltd
|date=14 Jun 2007
|isbn=978-1861978509
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1861978502</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>1861978502</amazonus>
}}
Every year for over two centuries, Americans have celebrated their
nation's birthday - the Fourth of July. On that date in 1776, the
Declaration of Independence was made, signalling the separation of the
colonies from British rule.
Those centuries of commemoration have cemented the myth of that sacred
date. But it is little more than that - a myth. Inasmuch as Americans
ever expressed their desire for independence so decisively, it probably
wasn't in fact on that date. If anything, it happened two days earlier.
I'm not a historian; I hated the subject at school, and this book made
me remember why. Even a slim book like this about the significance or
otherwise of a date long ago, revived the thought that often hovered at
the back of my younger but no less shallow mind: "so what?"
I exaggerate of course. This book is not really about whether it
mattered that a few dozen worthies signed a bit of parchment on a
certain date. It's about the significance that has latterly attached to
that date, about how myths can become more important than reality, and
the role of symbolic artefacts or actions in the narrative architecture
of a nation.
As such, ''The Fourth Of July'' is, once it gets over the speculation
about what did and didn't actually occur, quite interesting about
aspects of America's emergence into nationhood. It traces how the myths
about totemic symbols of the nation - the Liberty Bell; Uncle Sam; the
flag itself - have become enshrined as fact. It also looks at the way
that these creation myths, and their significance, have been adapted
according to the times in which they are celebrated.
All of which, once stripped of its academic language, isn't all that
surprising. After all, didn't our own patron saint turn out to be
Turkish? Wasn't Christmas originally a pagan celebration? What did
surprise and interest me was how much evidence there often is for what
is regarded as myth (eg Uncle Sam was a real person), and the shaky
foundations of what is often treated as fact.
The writing comes to life best in a vivid description of Jimi Hendrix's
appearance at a 1970 July 4 celebration concert. And even then you
suspect that the author's tongue is ever so slightly in his cheek.
I'm sure ''The Fourth Of July'' will appeal to serious students of
American history, particularly those interested in US culture and how it
venerates its national icons. I, sadly, found little to relate to, and
maybe this isn't really surprising. Much of the writing is pitched
somewhere above the level of the general reader. The author is clearly
at home with such recondite terms as 'rhetorical topoi' and expects his
readers to be similarly erudite.
The lay reader (certainly if they're as thick as me) may struggle with
the scholarly tone, the abstract treatment of the subject matter, and
some of the convoluted arguments. Even if you have no such difficulties,
the book is still a salutory reminder of how we are separated from
America, not only by a common language, but also by a simultaneously
familiar yet utterly alien code of rites and symbology.
{{amazontext|amazon=1861978502}}
{{commenthead}}
|title=The Fourth of July: And the Founding of America
|sort=Fourth of July: And the Founding of America
|author=Peter De Bolla
|reviewer=Paul Harrop
|genre=History
|summary=A scholarly and occasionally enlightening investigation of the truths and half-truths surrounding the birth of the American nation.
Could be heavy going for those not totally fascinated by the subject.
|rating=3
|buy=No
|borrow=Yes
|format=Hardback
|pages=224
|publisher=Profile Books Ltd
|date=14 Jun 2007
|isbn=978-1861978509
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1861978502</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>1861978502</amazonus>
}}
Every year for over two centuries, Americans have celebrated their
nation's birthday - the Fourth of July. On that date in 1776, the
Declaration of Independence was made, signalling the separation of the
colonies from British rule.
Those centuries of commemoration have cemented the myth of that sacred
date. But it is little more than that - a myth. Inasmuch as Americans
ever expressed their desire for independence so decisively, it probably
wasn't in fact on that date. If anything, it happened two days earlier.
I'm not a historian; I hated the subject at school, and this book made
me remember why. Even a slim book like this about the significance or
otherwise of a date long ago, revived the thought that often hovered at
the back of my younger but no less shallow mind: "so what?"
I exaggerate of course. This book is not really about whether it
mattered that a few dozen worthies signed a bit of parchment on a
certain date. It's about the significance that has latterly attached to
that date, about how myths can become more important than reality, and
the role of symbolic artefacts or actions in the narrative architecture
of a nation.
As such, ''The Fourth Of July'' is, once it gets over the speculation
about what did and didn't actually occur, quite interesting about
aspects of America's emergence into nationhood. It traces how the myths
about totemic symbols of the nation - the Liberty Bell; Uncle Sam; the
flag itself - have become enshrined as fact. It also looks at the way
that these creation myths, and their significance, have been adapted
according to the times in which they are celebrated.
All of which, once stripped of its academic language, isn't all that
surprising. After all, didn't our own patron saint turn out to be
Turkish? Wasn't Christmas originally a pagan celebration? What did
surprise and interest me was how much evidence there often is for what
is regarded as myth (eg Uncle Sam was a real person), and the shaky
foundations of what is often treated as fact.
The writing comes to life best in a vivid description of Jimi Hendrix's
appearance at a 1970 July 4 celebration concert. And even then you
suspect that the author's tongue is ever so slightly in his cheek.
I'm sure ''The Fourth Of July'' will appeal to serious students of
American history, particularly those interested in US culture and how it
venerates its national icons. I, sadly, found little to relate to, and
maybe this isn't really surprising. Much of the writing is pitched
somewhere above the level of the general reader. The author is clearly
at home with such recondite terms as 'rhetorical topoi' and expects his
readers to be similarly erudite.
The lay reader (certainly if they're as thick as me) may struggle with
the scholarly tone, the abstract treatment of the subject matter, and
some of the convoluted arguments. Even if you have no such difficulties,
the book is still a salutory reminder of how we are separated from
America, not only by a common language, but also by a simultaneously
familiar yet utterly alien code of rites and symbology.
{{amazontext|amazon=1861978502}}
{{commenthead}}
