Difference between revisions of "Sandbox"

From TheBookbag
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(175 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Reviewer Centre]]
 
 
If you're testing entries for the homepage or category pages, this is your header and footer:
 
 
{|class-"wikitable" cellpadding="15"
 
 
<!-- PUT NEW REVIEW HERE -->
 
 
|}
 
 
 
{{Frontpage
 
{{Frontpage
|isbn=0008284660
+
|author=Edward W Said
|title=Lies Lies Lies
+
|title=Representations of the Intellectual
|author=Adele Parks
 
 
|rating=4.5
 
|rating=4.5
|genre=Thrillers
+
|genre=Politics and Society
|summary=Simon Barnes had his first taste of beer in 1976 when he was just six years old. Over the years it would become a habit and then a need. By 2016 and with a wife and child of his own he was a functioning alcoholic - a fact known by everybody except Simon. He's concentrating on wanting another child to complete his family. His wife, Daisy, isn't worried. They took a long time to conceive Millie, who's perfect in every way, so why tempt fate? Simon's not inclined to let matters rest though and it's at a fertility clinic that he receives the news that will change all their lives: he's sterile.
+
|summary=Edward Said's ''Representations of the Intellectual'' is less a strict theory of what intellectuals are and more a passionate argument for what they should be. Said clearly rejects the comfortable image of the intellectual as a detached expert speaking only to other specialists. Instead, he insists on the intellectual as a public figure, often awkward, abrasive, and unpopular, who speaks truth to power even when it is inconvenient or risky.
 +
|isbn=Wendy_Cheyne
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:54, 29 January 2026

File:Wendy Cheyne.jpg

Review of

Representations of the Intellectual by Edward W Said

4.5star.jpg Politics and Society

Edward Said's Representations of the Intellectual is less a strict theory of what intellectuals are and more a passionate argument for what they should be. Said clearly rejects the comfortable image of the intellectual as a detached expert speaking only to other specialists. Instead, he insists on the intellectual as a public figure, often awkward, abrasive, and unpopular, who speaks truth to power even when it is inconvenient or risky. Full Review