132,610
edits
Changes
From TheBookbag
Jump to navigationJump to searchFrom Skedaddle to Selfie: Words of the Generation by Allan Metcalf (view source)
Revision as of 15:58, 5 December 2015
, 15:58, 5 December 2015Created page with "{{infobox |title=From Skedaddle to Selfie: Words of the Generation |author=Allan Metcalf |reviewer=John Lloyd |genre=Trivia |summary=A very interesting book, that might be a t..."
{{infobox
|title=From Skedaddle to Selfie: Words of the Generation
|author=Allan Metcalf
|reviewer=John Lloyd
|genre=Trivia
|summary=A very interesting book, that might be a tiny bit low on the changing words of American English but puts those changes in firm, sociological context.
|rating=3.5
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|pages=232
|publisher=OUP USA
|date=January 2016
|isbn=9780199927128
|website=http://www.allanmetcalf.net/
|video=
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>019992712X</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>019992712X</amazonus>
}}
I have to go a roundabout way to introducing this book, so bear with me. It stems partly from dictionaries and the etymology of the language we use, but more so if anything from a different couple of books, and their ideas of generations. The authors of those posited the idea that all those archetypical generations – the Baby Boomers, the Millennials, and those before, in between and since – have their own cyclical pattern, and the history of humanity has been and will be formed by the interplay of just four different kinds, running (with only one exception) in regular order. I don't really hold much store by that, and I certainly didn't know we'd started one since the Millennials – who the heck decides such things, for one? ''Somebody must have put out an order'', as someone here says of something else. But in the same way as generations get defined by collective persons unknown, so do words – and those words are certainly a clue to what was important, predominant and of course spoken in each decade.
Each time, therefore, gets the words it deserves, from the ''unalienable'' text of the USA's founding fathers, the ''skedaddling'' of their Civil War soldiers (at least they weren't military ''slackers'') to the swell later words, such as ''swell' itself. The faster-moving the generational change, so the faster the word use changes, as evidenced in later chapters that survey things that are generally technical in origin – the ''selfie'', the ''geek'', the ''LOL''.
The thing is, that however readable the book may be – flowing through quite regularly and very well from one section of a chapter to another, and from one word to another – the picture is not complete at times. Take music – forever destined to define generations and their differences, and a subject that occurs quite often here. We go from the surprise that ''jazz'' was a baseball reference before it meandered to the music halls, but we then get ''swing'' and so on to ''rhythm and blues'' and ''rock and roll'', but there's more to it than that. F Scott Fitzgerald here mentions ''jungle music'' (and not in the Goldie definition) and there clearly is a different book that would track these passing histories more fully than we get here. It's as if nobody ever made the mistake of thinking ''LOL'' was for 'lots of love', an important error that should have been given space.
Certainly some of the entries here seem to have too many references, and instances of use, to provide that full picture I sought. Only a couple of words apply to each of the first few generations, and the selection of words is obviously open to the opinion that they're chosen to provide an easy fit to the author's generational divide rule. The book is also fully US-centric; the ancient four-lettered F-word's entry here never touching on Reg Grundy and the Sex Pistols, but, er, one bloke and a notepad.
Still, what makes this book stand out is the sociology included in the look at these words. It must be one of the few places where you can trace the young from being, er, young, to ''adolescent'', and from there to ''teenaged'', and what they do from ''petting'', to ''hooking up'', to ''sexting''. The approach of the book, then, to show that it's not only prescriptive, chunky dictionaries that define our language, but the actual use of it on the street, and also that the words in turn define us the speakers/writers/texters in turn, is a novel one. I'm left with the impression a better book on the subject could be had, but this is good for now, and the subject is actually a more universally interesting one, of much more general appeal than the sociology of words would at first appear to hold.
I must thank the publishers for my review copy.
For a straighter look at the etymology and how modern words just purloin older ones, you might enjoy [[New Words for Old: Recycling Our Language for the Modern World by Caroline Taggart]]. How words from diverse corners of our tongue actually connect in the mists of time is explored by [[Words of a Feather by Graeme Donald]].
{{amazontext|amazon=019992712X}}
{{amazonUStext|amazon=019992712X}}
{{commenthead}}
[[Category:Politics and Society]]
[[Category:History]]
|title=From Skedaddle to Selfie: Words of the Generation
|author=Allan Metcalf
|reviewer=John Lloyd
|genre=Trivia
|summary=A very interesting book, that might be a tiny bit low on the changing words of American English but puts those changes in firm, sociological context.
|rating=3.5
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|pages=232
|publisher=OUP USA
|date=January 2016
|isbn=9780199927128
|website=http://www.allanmetcalf.net/
|video=
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>019992712X</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>019992712X</amazonus>
}}
I have to go a roundabout way to introducing this book, so bear with me. It stems partly from dictionaries and the etymology of the language we use, but more so if anything from a different couple of books, and their ideas of generations. The authors of those posited the idea that all those archetypical generations – the Baby Boomers, the Millennials, and those before, in between and since – have their own cyclical pattern, and the history of humanity has been and will be formed by the interplay of just four different kinds, running (with only one exception) in regular order. I don't really hold much store by that, and I certainly didn't know we'd started one since the Millennials – who the heck decides such things, for one? ''Somebody must have put out an order'', as someone here says of something else. But in the same way as generations get defined by collective persons unknown, so do words – and those words are certainly a clue to what was important, predominant and of course spoken in each decade.
Each time, therefore, gets the words it deserves, from the ''unalienable'' text of the USA's founding fathers, the ''skedaddling'' of their Civil War soldiers (at least they weren't military ''slackers'') to the swell later words, such as ''swell' itself. The faster-moving the generational change, so the faster the word use changes, as evidenced in later chapters that survey things that are generally technical in origin – the ''selfie'', the ''geek'', the ''LOL''.
The thing is, that however readable the book may be – flowing through quite regularly and very well from one section of a chapter to another, and from one word to another – the picture is not complete at times. Take music – forever destined to define generations and their differences, and a subject that occurs quite often here. We go from the surprise that ''jazz'' was a baseball reference before it meandered to the music halls, but we then get ''swing'' and so on to ''rhythm and blues'' and ''rock and roll'', but there's more to it than that. F Scott Fitzgerald here mentions ''jungle music'' (and not in the Goldie definition) and there clearly is a different book that would track these passing histories more fully than we get here. It's as if nobody ever made the mistake of thinking ''LOL'' was for 'lots of love', an important error that should have been given space.
Certainly some of the entries here seem to have too many references, and instances of use, to provide that full picture I sought. Only a couple of words apply to each of the first few generations, and the selection of words is obviously open to the opinion that they're chosen to provide an easy fit to the author's generational divide rule. The book is also fully US-centric; the ancient four-lettered F-word's entry here never touching on Reg Grundy and the Sex Pistols, but, er, one bloke and a notepad.
Still, what makes this book stand out is the sociology included in the look at these words. It must be one of the few places where you can trace the young from being, er, young, to ''adolescent'', and from there to ''teenaged'', and what they do from ''petting'', to ''hooking up'', to ''sexting''. The approach of the book, then, to show that it's not only prescriptive, chunky dictionaries that define our language, but the actual use of it on the street, and also that the words in turn define us the speakers/writers/texters in turn, is a novel one. I'm left with the impression a better book on the subject could be had, but this is good for now, and the subject is actually a more universally interesting one, of much more general appeal than the sociology of words would at first appear to hold.
I must thank the publishers for my review copy.
For a straighter look at the etymology and how modern words just purloin older ones, you might enjoy [[New Words for Old: Recycling Our Language for the Modern World by Caroline Taggart]]. How words from diverse corners of our tongue actually connect in the mists of time is explored by [[Words of a Feather by Graeme Donald]].
{{amazontext|amazon=019992712X}}
{{amazonUStext|amazon=019992712X}}
{{commenthead}}
[[Category:Politics and Society]]
[[Category:History]]
