The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver - Revision history

Sue at 13:30, 18 March 2018

2018-03-18T13:30:56Z

Sue at 15:03, 2 December 2014

2014-12-02T15:03:37Z

Sue at 16:43, 7 April 2013

2013-04-07T16:43:48Z

Sue at 17:43, 23 November 2012

2012-11-23T17:43:41Z

Keith at 10:51, 7 November 2009

2009-11-07T10:51:40Z

Keith: 1 revision

2009-10-24T17:17:19Z

1 revision

Keith at 19:24, 5 September 2008

2008-09-05T19:24:16Z

New review

{{infoboxsort
|title=The Poisonwood Bible
|sort=Poisonwood Bible
|author=Barbara Kingsolver
|reviewer=Sue Fairhead
|genre=General Fiction
|summary=Poisonwood Bible can be heavy going, but it is an interesting read, containing both political conundrums and an illustration of the frivolous lives we lead in the West.
|rating=3
|buy=Maybe
|borrow=Yes
|format=Paperback
|pages=626
|publisher=Faber and Faber
|date=10 Jan 2000
|isbn=057120175X
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>057120175X</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>057120175X</amazonus>
}}
It feels as if I've been reading this book for weeks and weeks... looking back, I realise it's only two and a half weeks. Still, that's a long time for me to take over a novel, and reflects my mixed feelings about it. It's the first book I've read by [[Barbara Kingsolver]], and I certainly enjoyed her writing style. The narration is shared by five people - a mother and her four daughters - and their distinct voices and characters came through strongly, with humour in places - particularly Rachel's malapropisms.

The story is about a hard-headed Baptist missionary who wants to convert a village in the Congo. He's not a very well-developed or likeable character, but the caricature enables the rest of the family to write about him from their differing perspectives, to learn valuable lessons about culture, and to cope with the immense difficulties that beset them.

At times it felt long-winded, and I found that one section was enough for me to read at a time. The ending dragged a bit, too. Yet it was a somehow compulsive book that kept me thinking, and I was never tempted to give up on it. Politics are interwoven throughout the book, which is well researched in addition to being based partly on the author's childhood experiences living in Africa. Does it reveal the truth about the destruction of a lovely country and American plots to overthrow its attempt at independence? I don't know enough to be certain, but there's almost certainly a fair amount of truth in it, even if only one person's viewpoint. Politics are never straightforward, after all.

It also cleverly demonstrates, without preachiness, the shallowness of some people's lives, and they way perspectives change so radically when living elsewhere. The family start by taking - of all things - packaged cake mixes into the Congo, not realising that humidity would ruin them. These mixes are a symbol of the frivolous lives they led before - and which Rachel continues to hanker after, until she believes she has found true fulfilment.

Recommended in a guarded way as a not-so-light read with good characterisation.

{{amazontext|amazon=057120175X}}

{{commenthead}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{infoboxsort
+{{infobox1
 |title=The Poisonwood Bible
 |sort=Poisonwood Bible
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 |date=January 2000
 |isbn=057120175X
-|amazonuk=<amazonuk>057120175X</amazonuk>
+|cover=057120175X
-|amazonus=<amazonus>057120175X</amazonus>
+|aznuk=057120175X
 }}

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |buy=Maybe
 |borrow=Yes
 |pages=626
 |publisher=Faber and Faber
@@ Line 31: / Line 30: @@
 {{amazontext|amazon=057120175X}}
 {{commenthead}}

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |amazonus=<amazonus>057120175X</amazonus>
 }}
 It feels as if I've been reading this book for weeks and weeks... looking back, I realise it's only two and a half weeks. Still, that's a long time for me to take over a novel, and reflects my mixed feelings about it. It's the first book I've read by [[Barbara Kingsolver]], and I certainly enjoyed her writing style. The narration is shared by five people - a mother and her four daughters - and their distinct voices and characters came through strongly, with humour in places - particularly Rachel's malapropisms.

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:17, 24 October 2009
(No difference)