The Crowded Bed by Mary Cavanagh - Revision history

Sue at 10:36, 8 August 2020

2020-08-08T10:36:11Z

Sue at 14:40, 15 March 2018

2018-03-15T14:40:03Z

Sue at 16:25, 21 December 2014

2014-12-21T16:25:10Z

Sue at 14:12, 28 November 2012

2012-11-28T14:12:56Z

Keith at 09:51, 7 November 2009

2009-11-07T09:51:59Z

Keith: 1 revision

2009-10-24T17:29:56Z

1 revision

Keith at 19:17, 5 September 2008

2008-09-05T19:17:31Z

New review

{{infoboxsort
|title=The Crowded Bed
|sort=Crowded Bed
|author=Mary Cavanagh
|reviewer=Sue Fairhead
|genre=General Fiction
|summary=A cleverly written book that starts with a murder, then takes us back in time to see what prompted it. Thought-provoking with great characterisation.
|rating=4
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|format=Paperback
|pages=352
|publisher=Transita
|date=19 Jan 2007
|isbn=978-1905175314
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1905175310</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>1905175310</amazonus>
}}
The book begins with a prologue. The author invites us to watch Dr Joe Fortune as he prepares to murder his father-in-law, before getting back into bed with his sedated wife Anna. Spine-chilling, particularly as the author adds that Joe is aware that he has sinned, but does not care.

Immediately we're taken back to 1955 where Joe is five years old, raised by a loving but rather claustrophobic Jewish family: his two parents and two grandparents. Then we're taken to 1965, when Anna is
five years old. The scene here is a formal Christmas dinner where Anna feels ill, and is severely reprimanded by her strict father.

Thus the stage is set for the rest of the book, which is helpfully described as taking place in both the present and the past. This is exactly what happens. Each chapter begins in one of the days leading up to the murder, written from Joe's perspective. Then there are lengthy flashbacks to the past, in both his and Anna's childhood and teenage years, and their early adult life. The main point, perhaps, is to show how even cold-blooded murder can sometimes seem entirely justified.

I was a bit ambivalent about reading this book. The blurb on the back tells me it's about revenge, mutual hatred, cruelty, violence and shocking revelations. It sounds over-dramatic and rather exhausting. I don't like thrillers; I like peaceful stories with happy endings. Having finished the book, however, I don't think the blurb does it justice. This is a character-driven novel which is very cleverly crafted, revealing the past in such as way as to build up a clear and positive picture of both Joe and Anna, and many of their relatives
too. There is violence and unpleasantness, but it's not described in gory detail. By the end of the first chapter I could quite see why Joe wanted to murder his wife's ghastly father.

Not every incident is explained in full at the time, so there's a gradual unfolding of the various subplots in ways that manage to seem entirely natural. No awkward pauses for thoughts about what had happened; instead we move almost seamlessly between the years, with each scene building on what has gone before and hinting about what is to come. The revelations happen gradually, so the shock isn't too great. And there's a bit of ironic humour here and there, too, that made me smile inwardly.

It was thought-provoking, too. By the end I was fully sympathising with Joe and hoping he wouldn't be detected as a murderer. I also found myself thinking about other issues that came up naturally in the
book: religious and racial intolerance, incest and adultery.

If I have a complaint about this book, it's the amount of bad language. Not so much the expletives used under strong emotion, but the casual use of the same words to describe acts of love. It wasn't so excessive as to put me off entirely, but I did get a bit bored of seeing the same four-letter word repeatedly and (in my view) unnecessarily.

Still, as a debut novel this is impressive. I look forward to reading more by this author in future.

{{amazontext|amazon=1905175310}}

{{commenthead}}

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |reviewer=Sue Fairhead
 |genre=General Fiction
-|summary=A cleverly written book that starts with a murder, then takes us back in time to see what prompted it. Thought-provoking with great characterisation.
+|summary=A cleverly written book that starts with a murder then takes us back in time to see what prompted it. Thought-provoking with great characterisation.
 |rating=4
 |buy=Yes
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Immediately we're taken back to 1955 where Joe is five years old, raised by a loving but rather claustrophobic Jewish family: his two parents and two grandparents. Then we're taken to 1965, when Anna is
-five years old. The scene here is a formal Christmas dinner where Anna feels ill, and is severely reprimanded by her strict father.
+five years old. The scene here is a formal Christmas dinner where Anna feels ill and is severely reprimanded by her strict father.
-Thus the stage is set for the rest of the book, which is helpfully described as taking place in both the present and the past. This is exactly what happens. Each chapter begins in one of the days leading up to the murder, written from Joe's perspective. Then there are lengthy flashbacks to the past, in both his and Anna's childhood and teenage years, and their early adult life. The main point, perhaps, is to show how even cold-blooded murder can sometimes seem entirely justified.
+Thus the stage is set for the rest of the book, which is helpfully described as taking place in both the present and the past. This is exactly what happens. Each chapter begins in one of the days leading up to the murder, written from Joe's perspective. Then there are lengthy flashbacks to the past, in both his and Anna's childhood and teenage years and their early adult life. The main point, perhaps, is to show how even cold-blooded murder can sometimes seem entirely justified.
-I was a bit ambivalent about reading this book. The blurb on the back tells me it's about revenge, mutual hatred, cruelty, violence and shocking revelations. It sounds over-dramatic and rather exhausting. I don't like thrillers; I like peaceful stories with happy endings. Having finished the book, however, I don't think the blurb does it justice. This is a character-driven novel which is very cleverly crafted, revealing the past in such as way as to build up a clear and positive picture of both Joe and Anna, and many of their relatives
+I was a bit ambivalent about reading this book. The blurb on the back tells me it's about revenge, mutual hatred, cruelty, violence and shocking revelations. It sounds over-dramatic and rather exhausting. I don't like thrillers; I like peaceful stories with happy endings. Having finished the book, however, I don't think the blurb does it justice. This is a character-driven novel which is very cleverly crafted, revealing the past in such as way as to build up a clear and positive picture of both Joe and Anna, and many of their relatives too. There is violence and unpleasantness, but it's not described in gory detail. By the end of the first chapter, I could quite see why Joe wanted to murder his wife's ghastly father.
 Not every incident is explained in full at the time, so there's a gradual unfolding of the various subplots in ways that manage to seem entirely natural. No awkward pauses for thoughts about what had happened; instead we move almost seamlessly between the years, with each scene building on what has gone before and hinting about what is to come. The revelations happen gradually, so the shock isn't too great. And there's a bit of ironic humour here and there, too, that made me smile inwardly.
-It was thought-provoking, too. By the end I was fully sympathising with Joe and hoping he wouldn't be detected as a murderer. I also found myself thinking about other issues that came up naturally in the
+It was thought-provoking, too. By the end, I was fully sympathising with Joe and hoping he wouldn't be detected as a murderer. I also found myself thinking about other issues that came up naturally in the
 book: religious and racial intolerance, incest and adultery.
 If I have a complaint about this book, it's the amount of bad language. Not so much the expletives used under strong emotion, but the casual use of the same words to describe acts of love. It wasn't so excessive as to put me off entirely, but I did get a bit bored of seeing the same four-letter word repeatedly and (in my view) unnecessarily.
-Still, as a debut novel this is impressive. I look forward to reading more by this author in future.
+Still, as a debut novel, this is impressive. I look forward to reading more by this author in future.
 {{amazontext|amazon=1905175310}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{infoboxsort
+{{infobox1
 |title=The Crowded Bed
 |sort=Crowded Bed
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 |date=January 2007
 |isbn=978-1905175314
-|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1905175310</amazonuk>
+|cover=1905175310
-|amazonus=<amazonus>1905175310</amazonus>
+|aznuk=1905175310
 }}
 The book begins with a prologue. The author invites us to watch Dr Joe Fortune as he prepares to murder his father-in-law, before getting back into bed with his sedated wife Anna. Spine-chilling, particularly as the author adds that Joe is aware that he has sinned, but does not care.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 |buy=Yes
 |borrow=Yes
 |pages=352
 |publisher=Transita
@@ Line 37: / Line 36: @@
 {{amazontext|amazon=1905175310}}
 {{commenthead}}

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:29, 24 October 2009
(No difference)