Pinocchio by Michael Morpurgo - Revision history

Kieran at 14:47, 23 April 2018

2018-04-23T14:47:33Z

Sue at 13:53, 9 February 2015

2015-02-09T13:53:14Z

Sue at 11:25, 7 January 2015

2015-01-07T11:25:02Z

Sue at 09:35, 19 October 2013

2013-10-19T09:35:42Z

Sue: Created page with "{{infobox |title=Pinocchio |author=Michael Morpurgo |reviewer=John Lloyd |genre=Confident Readers |rating=4 |buy=Yes |borrow=Yes |isbn=9780007339693 |pages=272 |publisher=Harp..."

2013-10-18T12:34:03Z

Created page with "{{infobox |title=Pinocchio |author=Michael Morpurgo |reviewer=John Lloyd |genre=Confident Readers |rating=4 |buy=Yes |borrow=Yes |isbn=9780007339693 |pages=272 |publisher=Harp..."

New review

{{infobox
|title=Pinocchio
|author=Michael Morpurgo
|reviewer=John Lloyd
|genre=Confident Readers
|rating=4
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|isbn=9780007339693
|pages=272
|publisher=Harper Collins
|date=September 2013
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>0007339690</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>0007339690</amazonus>
|website=
|video=
|summary=This telling of the story is perhaps more immediate than others, but does not gain much that the original lacked.
}}
It is a simple fact that too many of us have neglected to read all the classics. It strikes me that when a film version of one of them enters the canon as strongly as Disney's Pinocchio animation did, it becomes less an impetus to read the original, more of an excuse to not do so. I'm very happy then that the powerfully popular name of [[:Category:Michael Morpurgo|Michael Morpurgo]] is rectifying that with his latest hardback. I'm less convinced by how or why he's gone about it.

What we have, more or less, is a straightforward new version of the Collodi original, with the added twist that it's narrated in the first person. Here an older Pinocchio looks back on his errant childhood, and all his problems are brought to the fore – his wilful attempts to always run away and find a better life without working, the greed and simple-mindedness that leads him to fall prey to tricksters, his errant failure to repay anyone's trust or honour any promises to anyone.

But that's in the original – and that will always be the delight of the original, to see quite a lot of morals and aphorisms delivered in such a nice way; that and the fact that Collodi actually had far more talking animals that Disney ever dreamt of. Every beat of the original is replicated here, apart I think from Gepetto's friend at the beginning. There is certainly a case for saying that the immediacy of the first person narration will aid in getting the story across, and we do gain the 'other', modern time Pinocchio looking back on his story, talking about how it became a film, and admitting he was a fool. But a slip in printing where we get a short paragraph in the third person suggests Morpurgo was actually at one time just intending a straight translation of his own, and all power to his elbow I don't think he's varied the content enough to really justify his change.

What's more, with a fine translation such as that by [[Pinocchio by Carlo Collodi, Geoffrey Brock, Umberto Eco and Fulvio Testa|Geoffrey Brock]]you don't need anything to be made more immediate or overt – the writing is fresh enough and clear enough. Plus, you don't get modern colloquialisms such as here. I gave up counting the number of times this Pinocchio ''legged it'', ''lickety-spit'' or otherwise. I was waiting for one of the famous characters to ''rock up'', and for him to ''be across'' story.

Still, I will admit that in getting the name Pinocchio back into everyone's thoughts it might have been necessary to add Morpurgo's name to that of Collodi. You can also add that of Emma Chichester Clark, for her work is great – nicely painted scenes, with what I guess are pencilled or crayoned characters and collaged tree textures and fabric patterned birds overlain. But I go back to my hope that the original creator was enough, and say again that really this isn't the most necessary edition ever. Just as Ms Clark's image of the policeman poised to nab Pinocchio looked far too similar to that in the [[ ]], so this does not go far enough in its changes. My edition is ''Pinocchio by Pinocchio'' on the paper cover, and just ''Pinocchio'' on the hardback within. Proof, I think, that for all his work and cleverness, Morpurgo has not altered the contents as much as he was able.

I must thank the publishers for my review copy of this book, which remains a classic, in whichever edition you choose.

[[Pinocchio by Carlo Collodi and Sara Fanelli|Sara Fanelli]] has also offered up a version we enjoyed.

{{amazontext|amazon=0007339690}}
{{commenthead}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 7 January 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:

	{{amazontext\|amazon=0007339690}}		{{amazontext\|amazon=0007339690}}
		+	{{amazonUStext\|amazon=0007339690}}
		+
	{{commenthead}}		{{commenthead}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{infobox
+{{infobox2
 |title=Pinocchio
 |author=Michael Morpurgo
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |publisher=Harper Collins
 |date=September 2013
-|amazonuk=<amazonuk>0007512996</amazonuk>
+|aznuk=0007512996
-|amazonus=<amazonus>0007339690</amazonus>
+|aznus=0007339690
 |website=
 |video=

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |publisher=Harper Collins
 |date=September 2013
-|amazonuk=<amazonuk>0007339690</amazonuk>
+|amazonuk=<amazonuk>0007512996</amazonuk>
 |amazonus=<amazonus>0007339690</amazonus>
 |website=
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 [[Pinocchio by Carlo Collodi and Sara Fanelli|Sara Fanelli]] has also offered up a version we enjoyed.
-{{amazontext|amazon=0007339690}}
+{{amazontext|amazon=0007512996}}
 {{amazonUStext|amazon=0007339690}}
 {{commenthead}}

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 But that's in the original – and that will always be the delight of the original, to see quite a lot of morals and aphorisms delivered in such a nice way; that and the fact that Collodi actually had far more talking animals that Disney ever dreamt of.  Every beat of the original is replicated here, apart I think from Gepetto's friend at the beginning.  There is certainly a case for saying that the immediacy of the first person narration will aid in getting the story across, and we do gain the 'other', modern time Pinocchio looking back on his story, talking about how it became a film, and admitting he was a fool.  But a slip in printing where we get a short paragraph in the third person suggests Morpurgo was actually at one time just intending a straight translation of his own, and all power to his elbow I don't think he's varied the content enough to really justify his change.
-What's more, with a fine translation such as that by [[Pinocchio by Carlo Collodi, Geoffrey Brock, Umberto Eco and Fulvio Testa|Geoffrey Brock]]you don't need anything to be made more immediate or overt – the writing is fresh enough and clear enough.  Plus, you don't get modern colloquialisms such as here.  I gave up counting the number of times this Pinocchio ''legged it'', ''lickety-spit'' or otherwise.  I was waiting for one of the famous characters to ''rock up'', and for him to ''be across'' story.
+What's more, with a fine translation such as that by [[Pinocchio by Carlo Collodi, Geoffrey Brock, Umberto Eco and Fulvio Testa|Geoffrey Brock]] you don't need anything to be made more immediate or overt – the writing is fresh enough and clear enough.  Plus, you don't get modern colloquialisms such as here.  I gave up counting the number of times this Pinocchio ''legged it'', ''lickety-spit'' or otherwise.  I was waiting for one of the famous characters to ''rock up'', and for him to ''be across'' story.
-Still, I will admit that in getting the name Pinocchio back into everyone's thoughts it might have been necessary to add Morpurgo's name to that of Collodi.  You can also add that of Emma Chichester Clark, for her work is great – nicely painted scenes, with what I guess are pencilled or crayoned characters and collaged tree textures and fabric patterned birds overlain.  But I go back to my hope that the original creator was enough, and say again that really this isn't the most necessary edition ever.  Just as Ms Clark's image of the policeman poised to nab Pinocchio looked far too similar to that in the [[ ]], so this does not go far enough in its changes.  My edition is ''Pinocchio by Pinocchio'' on the paper cover, and just ''Pinocchio'' on the hardback within.  Proof, I think, that for all his work and cleverness, Morpurgo has not altered the contents as much as he was able.
+Still, I will admit that in getting the name Pinocchio back into everyone's thoughts it might have been necessary to add Morpurgo's name to that of Collodi.  You can also add that of Emma Chichester Clark, for her work is great – nicely painted scenes, with what I guess are pencilled or crayoned characters and collaged tree textures and fabric patterned birds overlain.  But I go back to my hope that the original creator was enough, and say again that really this isn't the most necessary edition ever.  Just as Ms Clark's image of the policeman poised to nab Pinocchio looked far too similar to that in the Brock, so this does not go far enough in its changes.  My edition is ''Pinocchio by Pinocchio'' on the paper cover, and just ''Pinocchio'' on the hardback within.  Proof, I think, that for all his work and cleverness, Morpurgo has not altered the contents as much as he was able.
 I must thank the publishers for my review copy of this book, which remains a classic, in whichever edition you choose.