HHhH by Laurent Binet - Revision history

Sue at 13:22, 22 February 2018

2018-02-22T13:22:30Z

Sue at 11:03, 14 November 2014

2014-11-14T11:03:26Z

Sue at 11:05, 24 November 2012

2012-11-24T11:05:49Z

Sue at 10:14, 31 October 2012

2012-10-31T10:14:54Z

Sue at 16:51, 8 September 2012

2012-09-08T16:51:50Z

Sue at 09:12, 27 May 2012

2012-05-27T09:12:05Z

Sue at 14:48, 28 January 2012

2012-01-28T14:48:03Z

Sue at 13:41, 28 January 2012

2012-01-28T13:41:02Z

Sue: Created page with "{{infobox |title=HHhH |author=Laurent Binet |reviewer=John Lloyd |genre=Historical Fiction |rating=5 |buy=Yes |borrow=Yes |isbn=9781846554797 |paperback=1846554802 |hardback=1..."

2012-01-28T13:37:35Z

Created page with "{{infobox |title=HHhH |author=Laurent Binet |reviewer=John Lloyd |genre=Historical Fiction |rating=5 |buy=Yes |borrow=Yes |isbn=9781846554797 |paperback=1846554802 |hardback=1..."

New review

{{infobox
|title=HHhH
|author=Laurent Binet
|reviewer=John Lloyd
|genre=Historical Fiction
|rating=5
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|isbn=9781846554797
|paperback=1846554802
|hardback=1846554799
|audiobook=
|ebook=
|pages=336
|publisher=Harvill Secker
|date=May 2012
|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1846554799</amazonuk>
|amazonus=<amazonus>1846554799</amazonus>
|website=
|video=
|summary=A history book, coloured as a novel, or a brilliant biography? You decide. What's beyond question is how compelling this story and the author's approach can be.
}}

First, the title. ''HHhH'' is short for ''Himmlers Hirn heisst Heydrich'' - Himmler's brain was called Heydrich. In other words, it's not a case of 'behind every great Nazi there's a greater woman', but behind Hitler's own deputy was a major strength to the party. Reinhard Heydrich was the ruler of what practically corresponds to the Czech Republic, led the SS and more, and bossed the workings of the Final Solution. Any good biography of this compelling character in those interesting times - given too the subplot of those who would assassinate him - is bound to be an excellent history book. But, despite this getting a high rating, this isn't one. Why not? The author says so.

In a stylistic quirk that will nag some, but I actually found very enjoyable, Binet has made sure this is not a history book, and makes a case for this being a novel. For one, he sticks to the present tense, and at times uses all of first, second and third person narratives at least once. And he has also inserted himself into proceedings. So we start with his interest in the story and why he felt the need to write it, and continue with some of his research. At later points he has to check up on his notes - what colour '''was''' the car Heydrich was in when shot at?!

He also drops in on other books and films portraying a similar story, and tells us what's right and wrong about them and their methods; he gives us teasing little tastes of what's to come, like a thriller writer, yet unlike a thriller writer tells us what he is doing. He looks back at paragraphs he has written and critiques them, or suggests he might cut them.

All this post-modernism points out most clearly how subjective history is - it's all in the hands of the author, and this one has a specific approach to the story, a certain attitude to the heroes who were parachuted into the Czech countryside with murder as their duty and little chance of escaping afterwards. But with the gamut of research he is proud to point out he has at his grasp, Binet also provides us with some very compelling bits of history, from the major story probably most people know, right down to the more trivial-seeming, yet equally horrific, details. One night some five hundred Hamburgers were arrested by the authorities, just for having a swing music party - which was both too Negro, and evidence of ""dangerous Anglophile trends"".

What I can't pin down is quite how the format of the book works. ""The people who took part in this story were not characters,"" he writes. Binet doesn't want to produce literature - his intent is to be a sincere memorialist for the Czech and the Slovak who went to kill Heydrich. To that extent he makes sure we know any dialogue he includes is fantasy - except when he's copying others' testimony from first-hand evidence. He's a little too noisy when he drops into diary format, and it's the diary of him writing the words we read and not the timeline of his plot, but I really liked his interjections.

Not being able to pin the approach down successfully, though, means I too am unsure what to call the book. Author and publisher insist it's a novel - yet there is just too much veracity in these pages, and too much truthful documentation has gone into it for it to be fiction. It could be just plain faction, yet that isn't normally so stylised into such a self-awareness. What is not up for debate is how excellent the book is. With the picture sweeping from the intimate data to the huge picture, Binet knows what he is doing. (He points out how awkward it is that four of the (non-)characters have the same name, for one, but gets us over that hurdle easily.) The little, bitty chapters he uses (over 250 in 350 pages) allows him to cover a lot of ground in a very quick, efficient and educational way - but as is the intent, this doesn't have the heart of a history book. It has, and is, more. Whatever it precisely is, it's quite splendid.

I must thank the publishers for my review copy.

The straight telling of those who wanted to kill Heydrich's top boss is in [[Killing Hitler by Roger Moorhouse]].

{{amazontext|amazon=1846554799}} {{waterstonestext|waterstones=8687362}}

{{commenthead}}

[[Category:Literary Fiction]]
[[Category:Biography]]
[[Category:History]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 8 September 2012
Line 58:		Line 58:
	[[Category:Biography]]		[[Category:Biography]]
	[[Category:History]]		[[Category:History]]
		+	[[Category:Thrillers]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{infobox
+{{infobox1
 |title=HHhH
 |author=Laurent Binet
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |publisher=Harvill Secker
 |date=May 2012
 |website=
 |video=
 |summary=A history book, coloured as a novel, or a brilliant biography?  You decide.  What's beyond question is how compelling this story and the author's approach can be.
 }}

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |borrow=Yes
 |isbn=9781846554797
 |pages=336
 |publisher=Harvill Secker
@@ Line 40: / Line 36: @@
 The straight telling of those who wanted to kill Heydrich's top boss is in [[Killing Hitler by Roger Moorhouse]].
-{{amazontext|amazon=0099555646}} {{waterstonestext|waterstones=8687362}}
+{{amazontext|amazon=0099555646}}
 {{commenthead}}

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |borrow=Yes
 |isbn=9781846554797
-|paperback=1846554802
+|paperback=0099555646
 |hardback=1846554799
-|audiobook=
+|audiobook=1452659087
-|ebook=
+|ebook=B007NG91ZO
 |pages=336
 |publisher=Harvill Secker
 |date=May 2012
-|amazonuk=<amazonuk>1846554799</amazonuk>
+|amazonuk=<amazonuk>0099555646</amazonuk>
 |amazonus=<amazonus>1846554799</amazonus>
 |website=
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 The straight telling of those who wanted to kill Heydrich's top boss is in [[Killing Hitler by Roger Moorhouse]].
-{{amazontext|amazon=1846554799}} {{waterstonestext|waterstones=8687362}}
+{{amazontext|amazon=0099555646}} {{waterstonestext|waterstones=8687362}}
 {{commenthead}}

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 |summary=A history book, coloured as a novel, or a brilliant biography?  You decide.  What's beyond question is how compelling this story and the author's approach can be.
 }}
 First, the title.  ''HHhH'' is short for ''Himmlers Hirn heisst Heydrich'' - Himmler's brain was called Heydrich.  In other words, it's not a case of 'behind every great Nazi there's a greater woman', but behind Hitler's own deputy was a major strength to the party.  Reinhard Heydrich was the ruler of what practically corresponds to the Czech Republic, led the SS and more, and bossed the workings of the Final Solution.  Any good biography of this compelling character in those interesting times - given too the subplot of those who would assassinate him - is bound to be an excellent history book.  But, despite this getting a high rating, this isn't one.  Why not?  The author says so.

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 {{commenthead}}
 [[Category:Historical Fiction]]
 [[Category:Biography]]
 [[Category:History]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |author=Laurent Binet
 |reviewer=John Lloyd
-|genre=Historical Fiction
+|genre=Literary Fiction
 |rating=5
 |buy=Yes
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 {{commenthead}}
-[[Category:Literary Fiction]]
+[[Category:Historical Fiction]]
 [[Category:Biography]]
 [[Category:History]]

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 He also drops in on other books and films portraying a similar story, and tells us what's right and wrong about them and their methods; he gives us teasing little tastes of what's to come, like a thriller writer, yet unlike a thriller writer tells us what he is doing.  He looks back at paragraphs he has written and critiques them, or suggests he might cut them.
-All this post-modernism points out most clearly how subjective history is - it's all in the hands of the author, and this one has a specific approach to the story, a certain attitude to the heroes who were parachuted into the Czech countryside with murder as their duty and little chance of escaping afterwards.  But with the gamut of research he is proud to point out he has at his grasp, Binet also provides us with some very compelling bits of history, from the major story probably most people know, right down to the more trivial-seeming, yet equally horrific, details.  One night some five hundred Hamburgers were arrested by the authorities, just for having a swing music party - which was both too Negro, and evidence of ""dangerous Anglophile trends"".
+All this post-modernism points out most clearly how subjective history is - it's all in the hands of the author, and this one has a specific approach to the story, a certain attitude to the heroes who were parachuted into the Czech countryside with murder as their duty and little chance of escaping afterwards.  But with the gamut of research he is proud to point out he has at his grasp, Binet also provides us with some very compelling bits of history, from the major story probably most people know, right down to the more trivial-seeming, yet equally horrific, details.  One night some five hundred Hamburgers were arrested by the authorities, just for having a swing music party - which was both too Negro, and evidence of ''dangerous Anglophile trends''.
-What I can't pin down is quite how the format of the book works.  ""The people who took part in this story were not characters,"" he writes.  Binet doesn't want to produce literature - his intent is to be a sincere memorialist for the Czech and the Slovak who went to kill Heydrich.  To that extent he makes sure we know any dialogue he includes is fantasy - except when he's copying others' testimony from first-hand evidence.  He's a little too noisy when he drops into diary format, and it's the diary of him writing the words we read and not the timeline of his plot, but I really liked his interjections.
+What I can't pin down is quite how the format of the book works.  ''The people who took part in this story were not characters,'' he writes.  Binet doesn't want to produce literature - his intent is to be a sincere memorialist for the Czech and the Slovak who went to kill Heydrich.  To that extent he makes sure we know any dialogue he includes is fantasy - except when he's copying others' testimony from first-hand evidence.  He's a little too noisy when he drops into diary format, and it's the diary of him writing the words we read and not the timeline of his plot, but I really liked his interjections.
 Not being able to pin the approach down successfully, though, means I too am unsure what to call the book.  Author and publisher insist it's a novel - yet there is just too much veracity in these pages, and too much truthful documentation has gone into it for it to be fiction.  It could be just plain faction, yet that isn't normally so stylised into such a self-awareness.  What is not up for debate is how excellent the book is.  With the picture sweeping from the intimate data to the huge picture, Binet knows what he is doing.  (He points out how awkward it is that four of the (non-)characters have the same name, for one, but gets us over that hurdle easily.)  The little, bitty chapters he uses (over 250 in 350 pages) allows him to cover a lot of ground in a very quick, efficient and educational way - but as is the intent, this doesn't have the heart of a history book.  It has, and is, more.  Whatever it precisely is, it's quite splendid.