Changes

From TheBookbag
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
The various theatre and film roles, their successes and failures, are all thoroughly described. 'The Private Life of Henry VIII' (1933) is recognised as one of his crowning achievements, and made him the first British actor to be awarded an Oscar, although the author’s verdict is that he did not give of his best, and after having brought the role to the stage, on the silver screen he was ''warming over something he'd done before''. By the end of 'Rembrandt' (1935), he notes that the viewer is ultimately disappointed, ''cheated of a full exploration of the central character''. From his last years, 'Abbot and Costello Meet Captain Kidd' (1952) is generally regarded as the low water mark of his career, and is described in these pages as ''proof, if one were needed, of the terrible degringolade (rapid deterioration) this once-great actor had suffered''. 'Hobson’s Choice' (1954) is criticised for his unconvincing performance. Callow has respect for his artistry, yet is clearly very objective in his assessments.
One of his last roles, which saw him return to the British stage, was the leading role in 'King Lear' in 1959. By this time his health was beginning to fail, and he was under no illusions. It had long been his ambition to take the role, and he had ''been preparing for it all his life'', yet before he left America for England, he remarked self-deprecatingly to a friend, ''I shall fail, of course.'' Yet it was probably a more agreeable commission than his deputising as host on the Ed Sullivan Show in 1956 when the presenter was recovering after a car accident. The occasion also marked Elvis Presley's first appearance on television, and while introducing him an out-of-place Laughton looked ''like the Victorian he always essentially was''. Could you picture Olivier or Gielgud compering ''Top Of The Pops''? No, I couldn’t, either.
The book is supplemented with a full filmography, list of theatre performances, and even a discography of 78 rpm discs and LPs. One minor criticism I would make is of the index, with some names omitted, and also the rather old-fashioned principle of not providing an entry for the book's main subject.

Navigation menu