Changes

From TheBookbag
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
|reviewer=Iain Wear
|genre=Sport
|rating=4.5
|buy=Yes
|borrow=Yes
|summary=Winning the Tour de France may be an uphill struggle or, usually, several days of uphill struggles. But reading Stephen Roche's story of how he achieved it certainly isn't.
}}
"With all the recent revelations about the systemised doping culture surrounding Lance Armstrong's team in the 1990s, it was interesting to read a story of a time before cycling was embroiled in one drugs scandal after another. Although perhaps not as memorable as Armstrong's career, Stephen Roche's will hold a place in cycling history for 1987, when he became only the second man to win the Tour de France, the Giro D'Italia and the World Championships in the same season. A quarter of a century after that remarkable feat, Roche has produced his autobiography, ''Born to Ride''.
The title seems apt, as it appears that Stephen Roche was destined for a life on two wheels from quite early on in his life. His father cycled and a neighbour spotted Stephen on his bike while he was a teenager and dragged him away from football in the park to try racing and Roche's course was set. From here on in, the book is a personal view of his career, with brief glimpses of his personal life and a little at the end about his life after cycling.
Recently, I described the writing style in [[Jack Hobbs: England's Greatest Cricketer by Leo McKinstry]] as perfectly fitting for the man and the actions it described. ''Born to Ride'' is exactly the same, in that the almost breathless and fast moving narrative when describing Roche's racing career fits the speed and demands of the sport perfectly. Cycling is a sport where a lot of activity takes place on consecutive days and Roche describes an awful lot of those days in the saddle, especially when he's competing in the major cycling events.
This does give the book a slightly one dimensional feel, as with Roche's life being entirely devoted to his sport, there is little time for anything else. This is reflected in the content of the book in that there are only brief mentions of his family in between the cycling and the parts of his life before and after cycling are really only touched upon. Whilst I can appreciate that Roche was a cyclist first, I would have liked a little more about the man, rather than just the cyclist he was. However, I can imagine that this single-minded devotion to his cycling is what allowed him to be as successful as he was and what is here is certainly good enough that you don't really notice what is missing.

Navigation menu